You might have to give up on your preferred maximum refresh rate, color gamut, peak brightness, panel type, or more to get a monitor that ticks the widest subset of boxes possible. Picking even the highest-end gaming screen involves some degree of compromise. $3000 for the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UQX is pretty steep, when the LG 48-inch C1 series OLED costs just $1300 in comparison - oh and the LG C1 OLED has plenty of HDMI 2.1 ports, the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UQX has none.If you're a display obsessive like I am, you're already aware that the quest for the perfect monitor never truly ends. but is it enough to justify the huge price tag over a far larger, better LG OLED TV? Well. You are paying a huge price for it though.

It's one of the most bleeding-edge gaming monitors on the market right now. This results in a truly gorgeous image for workstation and gaming use, as well as HDR - as HDR is really only useful with an OLED display, but the new Mini LED display with the ASUS ROG Swift PG32UQX is fantastic. This is important as you can cram in more of them behind the screen, with 1152 individual LED zones compared to 384 zones in a traditional 27-inch gaming monitor.

The big difference here is that between the IPS + Mini LED + quantum dot technology, you've got Mini LED that offers much smaller versions of the traditional LEDs. If you want HDMI 2.1 and want to stick with ASUS, then there's the ASUS ROG Strix XG43UQ - which I reviewed recently, linked above, and offers a far larger 43-inch display with the same 4K + 144Hz but adds in HDMI 2.1 connectivity. odd isn't the word, but very disappointing. Read more: ASUS ROG Strix XG43UQ Review - The Best HDMI 2.1 Gaming Monitorīut there's a big lack here - there's no HDMI 2.1 connectivity here which is just.

Pg35vq micro center